Reviewed August 2026
West Virginia requires mediation when parents cannot agree on a parenting plan. Under West Virginia Code 48-9-202(a)(3), the court shall require mediation if parents cannot resolve their issues and agree on a plan. The one exception: the West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals' procedural rules may show that mediation is inappropriate for that particular case. This statute is more direct than many states' mandatory mediation laws. But it pairs that requirement with a detailed screening system. The Supreme Court of Appeals must promulgate rules for premediation screening. Those rules check for domestic violence, child abuse or neglect, duress or coercion, substance abuse, mental illness, or other factors that could affect a party's safety or ability to meaningfully participate. West Virginia's law does not let those safety concerns become an automatic bar to mediation. Instead, the court can use them as a basis to skip ordering mediation altogether, or to excuse a parent from face-to-face meetings with the other parent. This is up to the court's discretion.
Virdix's document-preparation product currently prepares divorce paperwork for California and Florida cases. This page explains how mediation works under West Virginia law for people researching before they file. It is not legal advice, and Virdix does not prepare or file West Virginia paperwork. See how Virdix works for California divorces.
Get notified when Virdix reaches West Virginia
We'll send one email, nothing else, the day West Virginia launches.

W. Va. Code 48-9-202(a) lists mediation, or other nonjudicial procedures designed to help parents reach an agreement, among the court-ordered services available in a parenting plan dispute. Subsection (a)(3) makes this concrete. If the parents cannot resolve their issues and agree on a parenting plan, the court must require mediation. The one exception is when procedural rules adopted by the Supreme Court of Appeals show that mediation is not appropriate for that specific case.
Under subsection (b), the Supreme Court of Appeals must make and promulgate rules for premediation screening. Those rules check whether domestic violence, child abuse or neglect, threats or acts of duress or coercion, substance abuse, mental illness, or similar factors would hurt a party's safety. They also check a party's ability to meaningfully participate in mediation, or capacity to freely and voluntarily consent to any agreement reached.
Those rules must let a family court judge consider alternatives to mediation that could still help the parties build a parenting plan. The statute specifically bars those rules from creating an automatic bar to mediation just because domestic violence, abuse, duress, substance abuse, or mental illness is present. Instead, those factors can be grounds for the court, using its discretion, to decide not to order mediation at all, or to excuse a parent from meeting face-to-face with the other parent during the process.
Subsection (c) bars a West Virginia mediator from making a recommendation to the court. The mediator also cannot reveal information either parent disclosed during mediation under a reasonable expectation of confidentiality. There is one exception: a mediator may tell the court credible information about domestic violence or child abuse, even if it came up during a confidential mediation session.
Under subsection (d), mediation services ordered under this statute must be billed at an hourly cost that is reasonable given each parent's financial circumstances. That cost is assessed on a uniform sliding scale. If one parent can afford it significantly more than the other, the court can order that parent to pay some or all of the other parent's share. State revenues generally cannot be used to cover mediator costs directly. But the Supreme Court of Appeals may use part of its own budget for administrative costs of running mediation programs. Grants or gifts earmarked for mediation do not count as state revenue for this purpose.
Subsection (e) puts responsibility for setting mediator standards on the West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals. It must establish standards for the qualification and training of mediators who handle these parenting plan cases. The statute delegates the specifics to the court system rather than spelling them out itself. So the exact training hours and credentialing requirements are set through the court's own rules, not the underlying statute.
Not independently confirmed
Yes, generally. W. Va. Code 48-9-202(a)(3) requires the court to order mediation when parents cannot agree on a parenting plan. The one exception is when the Supreme Court of Appeals' procedural rules indicate mediation is inappropriate for that case.
The court has discretion to. Under subsection (b), domestic violence, abuse, duress, substance abuse, or mental illness cannot create an automatic bar to mediation. But they can be grounds for the court, in its discretion, to decide not to order mediation at all, or to excuse a parent from face-to-face meetings during mediation.
Generally no. Under subsection (c), a mediator cannot make a recommendation to the court. The mediator also cannot reveal information a parent disclosed under a reasonable expectation of confidentiality, except that the mediator may report credible information about domestic violence or child abuse.
It is billed on a uniform sliding scale based on each parent's financial circumstances, under subsection (d). If one parent can afford it much more than the other, the court can order that parent to cover some or all of the other's share. State revenue generally does not fund the mediator's fee directly.
The West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals, under subsection (e). It must establish standards for the qualification and training of mediators handling parenting plan cases.
Under subsection (b), the premediation screening rules let a family court judge consider alternatives to mediation. Those alternatives could still help the parties reach a parenting plan, rather than proceeding straight to a contested hearing.
This page is general information about mediation in West Virginia, not legal advice for your situation. Laws, fees, and procedures change over time; confirm current details with West Virginia's own courts before relying on anything here. Virdix is not a law firm and is not licensed to practice law in West Virginia. Virdix does not prepare or file West Virginia divorce paperwork. It is not a substitute for an attorney licensed in West Virginia.
In the states Virdix serves, it guides you through that state's own court forms so your paperwork is complete and consistent before you file. If you're filing in West Virginia, the resources above are the right place to start, and the form above will tell you the moment Virdix reaches your state.
If the court clerk rejects a document we prepared, we fix it for free until it's accepted. See how the guarantee works